Programme risk lives between trades.

The housing problem

Every additional interface adds programme and coordination risk.

• 01
  Multi-trade sequencing

  Traditional wall construction can require multiple specialist activities to be coordinated across the same envelope.
• 02
  Wet-process dependency

  Weather windows, curing and site conditions can add uncertainty to programme planning.
• 03
  Labour dependency

  A fragmented wall build increases reliance on trade availability and coordination.
• 04
  Performance assembled from parts

  The final envelope outcome depends on multiple products, interfaces and installation steps working together.

Where THOM is designed to help

Simplify the wall without publishing the proprietary recipe.

• 01
  Modular mechanical assembly

  Designed to reduce wet-process dependency and make the wall a more controlled installation package.
• 02
  Scalable thermal specification

  Basic and 65 mm high-performance configurations allow different thermal targets to be addressed, subject to validation.
• 03
  Lightweight logistics

  The current complete-wall design range supports standard handling and flat-pack delivery strategies.
• 04
  Controlled specification

  The same governed Product Version and Evidence Register underpin the public performance position.

What matters to a developer

The buying case is programme, cost, repeatability and evidence.

• 01
  Programme

  A more integrated envelope model is intended to reduce coordination burden and simplify the critical path.
• 02
  Envelope economics

  Use THOM’s governed installed-cost comparison rather than a static brochure claim.
• 03
  Repeatability

  A controlled product platform is designed to support consistent specification across repeated unit types.
• 04
  Procurement confidence

  Targets, testing, validated evidence and certification are deliberately kept separate.